Thursday, February 27, 2014

Rapporteur’s Report

Rapporteur’s Report,

The 15th of February, 2014, had the privelage of hosting the 399th session of the Smart Club at the premises of Hotel Yak and Yeti in the hall of the World Bank. After the coordinator Ms. Praveena Shrestha briefly introduced the smart club and “welcomed back” after the Valentine’s Day we proceeded to the introduction round. After asking the permission from the Overall Critical Analyst (OCA) Mr. Saurav Bhatta she gave us a brief insight on the list of role-takers for the session. This was followed by the introduction round, which our coordinator appealed to be made as short as possible. As our time keeper for the day reported, this took 8 minutes and 26 seconds. After this we had the National Anthem which had occupied 50 seconds.

The coordinator then introduced the Pre Decided Speaker (PDS) Ms. Sahara Bhetual to express herself on the topic “Existential Crisis: Absurdity or Realism?” She took over from the coordinator to explain that Existential Crisis meant questioning the meaning and the purpose of life. She followed this explanation of her topic with a line of a philosopher who said that we visited the earth and left it, contrary to the more popular belief that we live and die.  In the 4 minutes and 45 seconds she took she repeteadly mentioned that life has a purpose and it is our job to find what it is. She made Mark Twain speak for her as she borrowed his saying that the two most important day of life is your birthday and the one on which you found the purpose of life. She concluded by advising us to make our own destiny and to add colors to our existence. This was followed by a Question Answer round in which many genuine and tricky questions were asked but our speaker handled them extremely well the bottom-line of most answers were to enjoy life.

Next on the series was our Self Decided Speaker (SDS) Master Manish Khatiwada. He had an interesting topic Veganism: Is it true? (not Vegetarian.) After greeting everyone a Post Valentine’s Day he asked the OCA to extend a minute of his time for the speech which was duly granted. He started with the story of a man who owned a Animal Rearing Farm and when paralyzed due to an accident realized the cruelty of his deed and spent the remainder of his life as animal right activist. He described veganism as not using any animal product like milk, silk, meat and so on. In his 6 minutes and 27 seconds long oration he cited health, environment and animal liberations as the major reason for veganism. He mentioned that animal milk has been proven to degrade calcium and also asked people to see a friend in the animal. He cited that when an apple, a lamb, and a baby were kept together in the same room, the baby would eat the apple and play with the lamb and not the other way round. Before proceeding to the question answer round he repeated his appeal for everyone to be a vegan and reminded us that the question of our food is a question of their life. In the question answer round which he handled with great professionalism he also faced a question asking whether the slaughter of animals was a general rule of survival for existence. To this he gave a brilliant reply by the counter question that asked if it was right to hamper the weaker and the helpless human beings. He finally signed off the stage by answering an evolution related question to which he replied that if slavery which was right 100 years ago, why would not people develop the same thoughts about veganism.

Next was the turn for the Impromptu Speaker Master Samrat Sigdel. He was thrown the topic of Valentine Special among Politicians, an issue he admitted, which was quite unexpected. In his 4 minutes and 50 seconds long humor he shared his Idea that Politicians were too old to celebrate Valentine’s Day. De shared his experience where politicians called it a day of no value and one of the most overrated days. He referred to the three party politics in Nepal as a risky love tranigle where each one was pulling the others legs’. He then mentioned that the common thing in politics and love was a lot of talk and little work. Following on to his question answer round, he handled the high quality of questions extremely well. On one particular question that asked whether politicians could love or not, he gave a high quality reply saying that they are already in love, most of them have a family; it’s just that they do not express the way modern youngsters do.

This was followed by the voting round in which the audiences who had listened to all three speakers could vote on what they felt was the best speech of the day.

Next we had PDS commentator Master Nishan Dhungel who was called upon to comment on the first speech. He was satisfied with the Speakers’ eye contact and Hand Movements, but was critical that the speaker described only the first half of her topic. Adding more to her speech and suggesting on the methods to deal more proficiently with the topic he departed from his role.

Then we had on the stage a charming and a smiling girl, Ms. Barsha Bhandari who was there to comment on the SDS speaker. She was pleased with the speakers Structured Speech and was also impressed with his humor, time coverage, stage coverage, and body gestures but pointed out the aggressive nature of his speech and eye contact as the fields that needed more improvement. She was also impressed with his content part but added that he should have provided proper substitutes to animal products to make his dialect stronger.

Next was the turn of Master Ujwol Joshi who occupied 2 minutes and 40 seconds to comment on the speech of the Impromptu Speaker. He was impressed by the speaker’s humor, so much so, that he rated it as being 11 out of a possible 10. He was impressed with the way the speaker connected love and politics but asked him to work more on his voice modulations, stage coverage, and the habit of looking at a sheet of a paper. With this remarks he was off.

Past is tense, but the future is perfect; this was the line Master Prabhat Guragain used to introduce himself as the Grammarian on a session he defined to be grammatically satisfactory. After pointing out the mistakes of the role-takers in the four minutes and fifty seconds that he occupied, he suggested each speaker the ways to tackle off their mistakes. He was then followed by the Aha Counter Master Bimal Jashwal who reported the number of Unusual Pauses that each role-taker has made. Up next was the timekeeper Mr. Suraj Raj Pandey, who promptly reported the time each speaker had used. Then after having a few words from the Observer the coordinator was off her duty and left the stage for the OCA, Master Saurav Bhatta.

The OCA described the session as a good one and was pleased with the quiet and the calm nature of the audience. He suggested the Club Coordination Committee to have a better arrangement of the chairs and then followed on by asking the audience to state their name not their address or other details in the introduction. He asked the Speakers in general to try and engage the audience all the time and then moved on to person specific comments where he pointed out the strengths and weaknesses of each speakers and methods to improve. After announcing Master Manish Khitawada as the winner of the day, he finally concluded the first session of the day.

After the tea break there was a Valentine’s Day special on the second session which saw lots of poems and “Gagals” along with songs and speeches to go by. That marked the end of yet another brilliant and enthuastic session of the Smart Club.

By Abhash Raj Subedi 

No comments: